The Proposal Guys Jon and BJ's proposal blog
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

The buyer’s hopes and fears

7/9/2009

2 Comments

 
Posted by Jon
What’s it like being a purchaser? As regular readers will know, I started my career in procurement before moving into the world of proposal management – and I still spent a fair proportion of my time with buyers and evaluators. I thought a few insights into life on the other side might be of interest:

1) The enemy lies within. Somewhat bizarrely, the easiest discussions for a buyer are with their potential suppliers. It’s far tougher trying to align resources, budgets and views internally. Running the procurement process is often a precarious high-wire act.

2) Powerless purchasers. The evaluation team will formulate recommendations as to which supplier to choose – but they’ll rarely sign off the decision. Making the presentation internally to the “great and the good” can be a daunting prospect. And, as a buyer, I’ll probably choose whichever bidder I think I can sell internally most easily.

3) “I’m the buyer. Stupid.” Most procurement people are acutely conscious that they know far less about the subject matter of the bid than their potential suppliers. (If this is what their organisation did, they wouldn’t need to ask you to do it for them!)

4) “Your fate is in my hands.” I have the power of life or death over your bid. Win, and you’ll get the glory and our money. So you bidders had better be grateful, respectful, deferential and nice to me. (After all, my colleagues internally aren’t!).

5)  I’ll have to live with the consequences of the decision as to which bidder we choose – and those we reject. Thinking short-term, I’ll select whichever company will make me hit my performance objectives, whatever they may be. And in the medium term, I’ll want the bidder who’ll minimise the risk of things going wrong and maximise the probability of me looking like a hero. (And, incidentally, debriefing unsuccessful suppliers can be a terrifying prospect – especially losing incumbents).

6) Making it up as I go along. Only a small minority of purchasers have ever been trained in writing RFPs and leading evaluation workshops. I’ll copy and paste, I’ll use the last document I wrote; it was probably good enough then, and it’ll probably get me through now.

Cynical and jaded? Moi? No wonder I prefer working in proposals!​
2 Comments
Wendy Hersh
3/25/2016 05:13:47 pm

Have you seen Michael Asner’s e-newsletter? http://www.rfpmentor.com/rfp-report.html has back issues. He tries to educate on how to write a better RFP, not a better proposal, but a better RFP.

Reply
Jon
3/25/2016 05:14:07 pm

Hi, Wendy – thanks for the link. There’s certainly some great stuff in Michael’s newsletters.

I love it when I run training for purchasing folks on how to develop better RFPs, and on how to engage their bidders more effectively during the purchasing process. It’s fascinating to see the realisation dawn that it’s in their best interests to run a process that draws out the best possible proposals from each of their potential suppliers, rather than making the process as complex as possible!

Likewise, when we run sessions for sales and proposal folks on “understanding the buyer”, you can almost see the light bulbs switch on around the room when they realise why purchasing folks behave like they so often do – and understand how to use those insights to their advantage during the bid process!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Articles by Topic

    All
    APMP & Accreditation
    Interviews And The Panel
    Musings
    Processes & Best Practice
    Proposal Guys News
    Proposal Panda
    Proposal Training
    Purchasing Insights
    Word Play & Writing

    Authors

    BJ Lownie and Jon Williams are the co-founders of Strategic Proposals.

    Subscribe



    * Required fields

    SP News

    Strategic Proposals News

    RSS Feed

Picture
Website by Digital Media Design, Inc.